Skip to main content

POLICE REVIEW AND PARADE GOSSIP

 



                                          


                                            The title page of the first edition of Police Review



Police Review, or Police Review and Parade Gossip to use its original title, was the most important magazine of its type for well over a century.  From 1893 to 2011 it covered news stories and other subjects relating to the police.  It is still missed by serving and retired officers.  At first it proclaimed that it was the ‘Organ of the British Constabulary’.  It never claimed to be the ‘official organ’.  It was an independent voice.  Independent of the government, independent of Chief Constables, Watch Committees, Police Authorities and the Federation.  At various times it upset all of those groups and perhaps this was the true measure of its success.

Within three years of its first publication the format of the magazine settled into a pattern that changed little in a century.  Each edition contained news, features, articles on the law, Q&A columns, examination courses and letters to the editor.  Of course, the style changed to keep up with the times.  The Victorian numbers now seem rather pompous, or at least a tad formal.  Few letter writers are named.  The use of pseudonyms was essential to protect serving officers from the wrath of their chief constables.  Some of the issues that concerned correspondents will be familiar to police officers of all generations.  Conditions of service, pensions, equipment, sentencing and the irritation caused by direct entrance to the service at a senior level by those otherwise qualified by other means, are subjects that never went away.    

In reading the early magazines I am struck by how difficult life was for our Victorian ancestors.  Police officers were not well paid.  They were subject to the whims of those set over them.  They were the victims of violent assaults on a regular basis.  Discipline was universally firm and under some Chiefs very harsh.  I was shocked by the short sentences given for assaulting officers and by the number of suicides and attempted suicides of officers.  The stresses of the job were, and of course remain, considerable.  It does not do to forget that an officer who attempted suicide was likely to lose his job and would probably be prosecuted for attempting to take his own life.  Before the welfare state (a phrase one doesn’t hear much these days) an inability to earn a living meant disaster for a man and his family.  As now, police officers who left the force with a bad ‘character’ did not find getting a new job at all easy.

The backdrop to policing in 1893 was of course very different to the present day.  Most forces were small and offered little training.  There were many forces and the national structure was more akin to the situation we see in the United States where numerous forces and agencies have a law enforcement role.  Just by reading a couple of magazines from the mid 1890s and, without looking at any other sources, I would guess that there were at least a dozen forces, or bodies of constables in London alone.

The back numbers of Police Review have not been fully digitised.  Some years have been microfilmed.  Complete runs are rare.  Many of the older editions are in poor condition.  They represent an important source for police historians.  The pandemic has increased our reliance on digital and on line sources, but if we are to do our job properly as historian we still have to go back to basics.  This means visiting archives and wading through unindexed, or poorly indexed material.  One of the problems in trying to research the history of railway and dock policing is the fact that so much of what is cited relies on secondary sources or oft repeated stories.  Police Review is an excellent source.  Therefore I intend going through the first decade of the magazine and extracting items of interest to students of the history of transport policing.  In doing this I have the welcome support and expertise of the British Transport Police History Group (BTPHG).  If the process is productive the project could be expanded.  The material found will be made accessible via the BTPHG.  I have no doubt that, if nothing else, it will give me something to blog about.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Give me a firm place to stand.........

  Is policing better today than it was 50 years ago?   Is this even a valid question?   My answer to both is   straightforward: ‘I don’t know’.   I suspect that most things are better and some things have declined but generally it is the sort of question that can take up a lot of time and enough hot air to power a dirigible.   I really DON’T want to start a debate on this because what concerns me most is my own shifting perspective.   As a grumpy git I find the sight of scruffy police officers looking bored and staring at their telephones really annoying.   I don’t understand why wearing a traditional helmet is so difficult and I don’t like the rather lightweight approach to discipline.   On the other hand my professional dealings with police officers show me that modern officers are bright, caring, thoughtful and determined to do the right thing.   As events demonstrate there is no shortage of brave people in today’s service. The horrors of racism and misogyny still haunt the service

Law and History 2: JUST THE SAME AS OTHER FORCES?

  Reading through this before posting makes me fear that it is not historical enough for this blog and trespasses into contemporary issues.   So be it.   But I do feel it necessary to remind readers that this blog does NOT represent the view of the BTPHG.   These ramblings are mine alone. It is rarely accurate to say that history repeats itself, but it is true that somethings that we think are settled in the past return to challenge us again. When I was a serving police officer in BTP I saw a steady evolution in the status of the force.   The achievements of officers, particularly in facing the ‘decade of disasters’ (1980s) and the acknowledged expertise of BTP in dealing with certain classes of activity (terrorism, theft person, theft of goods in transit, major incident response, football disorder etc) all led to an increasing recognition that BTP was an equal member of the police family.   In concrete terms this had been marked by the recommendation of the Wright Committee into the

Police Review & Parade Gossip 1902/3

  I have, at long last, returned to my project of searching early editions of Police Review & Parade Gossip for items relating to the Rail, Dock and Canal (RDC) Policing.   I have run into a couple of years where the index (which was compiled at the end of end calendar year) is missing which means I have had no choice but to go through every page of every edition.   Police Review was a weekly publication that described itself as ‘The Organ of the British Constabulary’.   It provides a valuable insight into the issues that concerned police officers and the public. So, what were the big questions of the early Edwardian period?   Well, questions of law make a frequent appearance together with operational demands.   The delay to the Coronation of Edward VII in 1902 (he was ill) led to a lot of operational angst.   Even today mutual aid brings challenges but imagine what it was like when there were 243 forces (i) covering England, Scotland and Wales.   Assaults on officers were at a v