28th February Anniversary Updates

After writing the post about the anniversaries that fall on 28th February I had an opportunity to look in the BTP Hisotry Group Archive. There isn't much about Stechford, only a couple of newspaper items. But there was also this letter from the Coroner pointing to the high quality of statement taking. These days such an incident would have attracted a much larger inquiry but in 1967 the work of a few officers in investigating the incident and establishing the underlying reasons was crucial and, as demonstrated by the letter, essential for the purposes of a public hearing.

Letter from HM Coroner to BTP Divisional Commander re investigation into the Stechford Railway accident 1967. Ref BTPHG D/Stech

Comments

Give me a firm place to stand.........

Is policing better today than it was 50 years ago? Is this even a valid question? My answer to both is straightforward: ‘I don’t know’. I suspect that most things are better and some things have declined but generally it is the sort of question that can take up a lot of time and enough hot air to power a dirigible. I really DON’T want to start a debate on this because what concerns me most is my own shifting perspective. As a grumpy git I find the sight of scruffy police officers looking bored and staring at their telephones really annoying. I don’t understand why wearing a traditional helmet is so difficult and I don’t like the rather lightweight approach to discipline. On the other hand my professional dealings with police officers show me that modern officers are bright, caring, thoughtful and determined to do the right thing. As events demonstrate there is no shortage of brave people in today’s service. The horrors of racism and misogyny still haunt the service

Law and History 2: JUST THE SAME AS OTHER FORCES?

Reading through this before posting makes me fear that it is not historical enough for this blog and trespasses into contemporary issues. So be it. But I do feel it necessary to remind readers that this blog does NOT represent the view of the BTPHG. These ramblings are mine alone. It is rarely accurate to say that history repeats itself, but it is true that somethings that we think are settled in the past return to challenge us again. When I was a serving police officer in BTP I saw a steady evolution in the status of the force. The achievements of officers, particularly in facing the ‘decade of disasters’ (1980s) and the acknowledged expertise of BTP in dealing with certain classes of activity (terrorism, theft person, theft of goods in transit, major incident response, football disorder etc) all led to an increasing recognition that BTP was an equal member of the police family. In concrete terms this had been marked by the recommendation of the Wright Committee into the

Police Review & Parade Gossip 1902/3

I have, at long last, returned to my project of searching early editions of Police Review & Parade Gossip for items relating to the Rail, Dock and Canal (RDC) Policing. I have run into a couple of years where the index (which was compiled at the end of end calendar year) is missing which means I have had no choice but to go through every page of every edition. Police Review was a weekly publication that described itself as ‘The Organ of the British Constabulary’. It provides a valuable insight into the issues that concerned police officers and the public. So, what were the big questions of the early Edwardian period? Well, questions of law make a frequent appearance together with operational demands. The delay to the Coronation of Edward VII in 1902 (he was ill) led to a lot of operational angst. Even today mutual aid brings challenges but imagine what it was like when there were 243 forces (i) covering England, Scotland and Wales. Assaults on officers were at a v

Policing Public Transport: A Neglected History

Search This Blog