Skip to main content

Constable Sibthorpe

PUNCH 1847

A DANGEROUS CHARACTER

Policeman Sibthorpe. “Come, it’s High Time You Were taken to the House; You’ve Done Quite Mischief Enough”

 

For many years PUNCH was a popular and successful magazine, famous for the quality of its content and the ingenuity of its artwork.  Its influence extended far beyond its circulation and many people were surprised when it closed in 1992.  An attempt a few years later to revive the title failed. 

PUNCH was a satirical magazine. It regularly lampooned the ‘railway mania’ of the mid nineteenth century.  It also used satire as a vector of comment on politicians and society figures.  There were many references to the railway throughout the magazine’s run and I will make other references to railway police related cartoons in future blogs.

The above cartoon shows an early locomotive with a face, hands and feet being ‘arrested’ by Policeman Sibthorpe, who is dressed in early (railway?) police uniform with a top hat and holding a large truncheon.

Charles de Laet Waldo SIBTHORP MP (1783-1855), known as Colonel SIBTHORP, was a regular target of PUNCH’s satire.  He was a reactionary Tory MP and was known for being ‘opposed to everything’. He lived in a permeant state of outrage and lamented the passing of the eighteenth century. He campaigned against:  Catholic Emancipation, The Emancipation of Jews, The Great Reform Act 1832 and the Repeal of the Corn Laws.  He thought the Great Exhibition was:

“One of the greatest humbugs, one of the greatest frauds, one of the greatest absurdities ever known…..Take care of your wives and daughters, take care of your property and your lives” (1)

He was highly suspicious of foreigners, including the Prince Consort.  He gained Peel’s support in reducing the amount of funding provided to Prince Albert and in doing so made a life long enemy of Queen Victoria, who refused to visit his constituency.   

He was especially against the introduction and the expansion of the railways.  He regarded railways as a sign of the country’s moral and physical decline and took every opportunity to oppose railway construction.  He regarded the ‘steam humbugs’ (a favourite word of his) as ‘a degrading form of transport’ (2) and he longed for the return of the ‘happy mode of travelling the turnpike roads in chaises, carriages and stages’ (3).  Another PUNCH cartoon shows him dressed as Don Quixote charging, lance extended, at a train.

He had mixed feelings about policing as well.

His extreme, and generally apocalyptic, views were combined with a habit of dressing as a gentleman from the 1790s.  It is not surprising that he was a popular subject for caricature. 

The current MP for North East Somerset comes to mind as I write this………….

Sibthorp was not unpopular.  His nationalistic tub thumping (and alas even his racism) was, at the very least ,thought to be amusing by his associates.  In a country where change was occurring at a speed unheard of in human history there were many people who yearned for a more simple way of living.  The coming of the railways changed the world.  They changed, amongst other things, the nature of crime.  Change is always a mixed bag and those that adopt a blanket opposition will inevitably attract some support. 

What would Col Sibthorp, or even Constable Sibthorpe, make of the UK and the railway network in the 21st century? 

As we witness the opening of the Elizabeth line this week I fear he would not be impressed.

 

Philip Trendall

 

Notes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sibthorp

Michell, J. F. (1999). Eccentric Lives and Peculiar Notions. United States: Adventures Unlimited Press.  P57 https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Eccentric_Lives_and_Peculiar_Notions/ZzDHPKxDkAwC?hl=en&gbpv=1

 

(1)    Mitchell 1999, p59

(2)    Ibid, P61

(3)    Ibid, P61

 

Philip Trendall

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Give me a firm place to stand.........

  Is policing better today than it was 50 years ago?   Is this even a valid question?   My answer to both is   straightforward: ‘I don’t know’.   I suspect that most things are better and some things have declined but generally it is the sort of question that can take up a lot of time and enough hot air to power a dirigible.   I really DON’T want to start a debate on this because what concerns me most is my own shifting perspective.   As a grumpy git I find the sight of scruffy police officers looking bored and staring at their telephones really annoying.   I don’t understand why wearing a traditional helmet is so difficult and I don’t like the rather lightweight approach to discipline.   On the other hand my professional dealings with police officers show me that modern officers are bright, caring, thoughtful and determined to do the right thing.   As events demonstrate there is no shortage of brave people in today’s service. The horror...

Films for Thought

  While searching the index to the material held by the Imperial War Museum (IWM) I stumbled across a couple of items relevant to this blog.   Film footage can sometimes feel like a peep hole into the past.   Each individual that appears would have had their own story to tell.   Perhaps this is a theme I will return to in relation to the footage which catches – sometimes only in passing – railway, dock or canal police officers. The two IWM clips that caught my eye were: A 1942 film showing war work being carried out by women on the Southern Railway.   Includes a shot of a member of WPC, Southern Railway Police directing traffic at Waterloo.   The commentary reflects the social assumptions of the time.   https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/1060021182   A silent 1940 film about the evacuation of children.   Shows footage at the front of St Pancras Station with police officers including an LMS Sergeant. https://www.iwm.org...

Law and History 2: JUST THE SAME AS OTHER FORCES?

  Reading through this before posting makes me fear that it is not historical enough for this blog and trespasses into contemporary issues.   So be it.   But I do feel it necessary to remind readers that this blog does NOT represent the view of the BTPHG.   These ramblings are mine alone. It is rarely accurate to say that history repeats itself, but it is true that somethings that we think are settled in the past return to challenge us again. When I was a serving police officer in BTP I saw a steady evolution in the status of the force.   The achievements of officers, particularly in facing the ‘decade of disasters’ (1980s) and the acknowledged expertise of BTP in dealing with certain classes of activity (terrorism, theft person, theft of goods in transit, major incident response, football disorder etc) all led to an increasing recognition that BTP was an equal member of the police family.   In concrete terms this had been marked by the recommendation of ...