Skip to main content

Constable Sibthorpe

PUNCH 1847

A DANGEROUS CHARACTER

Policeman Sibthorpe. “Come, it’s High Time You Were taken to the House; You’ve Done Quite Mischief Enough”

 

For many years PUNCH was a popular and successful magazine, famous for the quality of its content and the ingenuity of its artwork.  Its influence extended far beyond its circulation and many people were surprised when it closed in 1992.  An attempt a few years later to revive the title failed. 

PUNCH was a satirical magazine. It regularly lampooned the ‘railway mania’ of the mid nineteenth century.  It also used satire as a vector of comment on politicians and society figures.  There were many references to the railway throughout the magazine’s run and I will make other references to railway police related cartoons in future blogs.

The above cartoon shows an early locomotive with a face, hands and feet being ‘arrested’ by Policeman Sibthorpe, who is dressed in early (railway?) police uniform with a top hat and holding a large truncheon.

Charles de Laet Waldo SIBTHORP MP (1783-1855), known as Colonel SIBTHORP, was a regular target of PUNCH’s satire.  He was a reactionary Tory MP and was known for being ‘opposed to everything’. He lived in a permeant state of outrage and lamented the passing of the eighteenth century. He campaigned against:  Catholic Emancipation, The Emancipation of Jews, The Great Reform Act 1832 and the Repeal of the Corn Laws.  He thought the Great Exhibition was:

“One of the greatest humbugs, one of the greatest frauds, one of the greatest absurdities ever known…..Take care of your wives and daughters, take care of your property and your lives” (1)

He was highly suspicious of foreigners, including the Prince Consort.  He gained Peel’s support in reducing the amount of funding provided to Prince Albert and in doing so made a life long enemy of Queen Victoria, who refused to visit his constituency.   

He was especially against the introduction and the expansion of the railways.  He regarded railways as a sign of the country’s moral and physical decline and took every opportunity to oppose railway construction.  He regarded the ‘steam humbugs’ (a favourite word of his) as ‘a degrading form of transport’ (2) and he longed for the return of the ‘happy mode of travelling the turnpike roads in chaises, carriages and stages’ (3).  Another PUNCH cartoon shows him dressed as Don Quixote charging, lance extended, at a train.

He had mixed feelings about policing as well.

His extreme, and generally apocalyptic, views were combined with a habit of dressing as a gentleman from the 1790s.  It is not surprising that he was a popular subject for caricature. 

The current MP for North East Somerset comes to mind as I write this………….

Sibthorp was not unpopular.  His nationalistic tub thumping (and alas even his racism) was, at the very least ,thought to be amusing by his associates.  In a country where change was occurring at a speed unheard of in human history there were many people who yearned for a more simple way of living.  The coming of the railways changed the world.  They changed, amongst other things, the nature of crime.  Change is always a mixed bag and those that adopt a blanket opposition will inevitably attract some support. 

What would Col Sibthorp, or even Constable Sibthorpe, make of the UK and the railway network in the 21st century? 

As we witness the opening of the Elizabeth line this week I fear he would not be impressed.

 

Philip Trendall

 

Notes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sibthorp

Michell, J. F. (1999). Eccentric Lives and Peculiar Notions. United States: Adventures Unlimited Press.  P57 https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Eccentric_Lives_and_Peculiar_Notions/ZzDHPKxDkAwC?hl=en&gbpv=1

 

(1)    Mitchell 1999, p59

(2)    Ibid, P61

(3)    Ibid, P61

 

Philip Trendall

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Do Non Home Department Police Forces Get Missed When Legislation is Being Drafted

  WHY DO NON HOME DEPARTMENT POLICE FORCES GET MISSED WHEN LEGISLATION IS BEING DRAFTED? Note: The Home Department is the traditional name for the Home Office and the Home Secretary is technically the Secretary of State for the Home Department.   In this and other pieces I tend to use the titles interchangeably.   I hope that by confusing my readers I can distract them from the boring nature of the blog itself.   One part of my work lies in the field of research.   This is not well paid and is a somewhat lonely pastime, but I do enjoy the thrill of tracking down information in archives, dusty corners of the internet and guiding people around bits of London. I find that there is often an overlap between the past and present, indeed life is a continuum.    The present is a product of the past.   The influence of what has come before is often apparent in what is done today. Frequently to understand the modern operating context we have to get pa...

GWR Police and the Local Magistrates 1839

  Fig One:  Copy of Letter to the Reading Justices found in the correspondance of the Home Secretary 183 9 Last week I was at the National Archives working on some papers relating to an RAF Bomb Disposal Flight during the Second World War.   Naturally I found myself reading the Home Secretary’s correspondence file for 1839.   These research leaps will be very familiar to those who spend time in archives and libraries.   I have (mostly) given up researching the history of the railway police but it is hard to resist the temptation of surfing a catalogue and ordering a few extra files to pad out the task in hand.   On this occasion I found myself reading letters that had been sent to Lord John Russell (1) and in particular a of a letter sent by the Great Western Railway to the Justices of the Peace in Reading which had been copied to the Home Secretary. Fig Two:  Lord John Russell (1792-1878): later The Earl Russell.  Photo 1861. The early days of ...

Films for Thought

  While searching the index to the material held by the Imperial War Museum (IWM) I stumbled across a couple of items relevant to this blog.   Film footage can sometimes feel like a peep hole into the past.   Each individual that appears would have had their own story to tell.   Perhaps this is a theme I will return to in relation to the footage which catches – sometimes only in passing – railway, dock or canal police officers. The two IWM clips that caught my eye were: A 1942 film showing war work being carried out by women on the Southern Railway.   Includes a shot of a member of WPC, Southern Railway Police directing traffic at Waterloo.   The commentary reflects the social assumptions of the time.   https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/1060021182   A silent 1940 film about the evacuation of children.   Shows footage at the front of St Pancras Station with police officers including an LMS Sergeant. https://www.iwm.org...