Skip to main content

Being a Very Brief Reflection on Railway Terrorism in 1973

 

I spent an interesting few hours today doing some research and, as always, I was distracted by other issues.  I was reading the Annual Report of the Chief Constable of British Transport Police for 1973 and what caught my eye was the section on terrorism.  From time to time I get the impression that some people think that terrorism was invented only a few years ago.  The lethal terrorist campaigns of earlier decades are often forgotten.

In 1973 the RAILWAY in Great Britain saw:

5                           IEDs explode

5                           IEDs defused

1,314                   Telephone Bomb Threats

715                      Suspect Packages

38                        Suspect Cars

78                        Suspect Letters

And 22 Other incidents

That’s a total of 2,175 incidents and, as the Chief Constable pointed out, a major call on the resources of the force.

Nobody was killed by terrorists on the railway in 1973, although fatalities did occur elsewhere in the UK.  It was for example the year of the Old Bailey bombing.

The incidents included:

1.       An explosion at Victoria Station which injured 3 officers and 4 members of the public

2.       Explosions at King’s Cross and Euston on the same day – one device was thrown and the other ‘placed’,  injuring between 14 and 21 people.  The ‘warning’ call came five minutes before the first device was detonated.

3.       An explosion at Sloane Square Station

4.       Bombs placed on separate days at Baker Street Station

5.       An incendiary device that ignited at Birmingham New Station.

 

Terrorism is a permanent backdrop to railway operations. Within a few years of opening the London Underground was being attacked.  The threat is never far away, and this is true the world over. 

Planners and responders know that there is no room for complacency however ‘quiet’ it may seem.  Most attacks occur without intelligence predicting them and happen without warning.  The need for vigilance is perpetual, but thoroughly routine.   Vigilance need not describe an approach dominated by fear or a semi panic created by contemporary events.  The best sort of vigilance is an exercise in resigned common sense.

 

 

Phil Trendall

British Transport Police, 1974. Annual Report of the Chief Constable for the Year 1973. London: British Railways Board, p.34.

The Report was accessed courtesy of the British Transport Police History Group 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Do Non Home Department Police Forces Get Missed When Legislation is Being Drafted

  WHY DO NON HOME DEPARTMENT POLICE FORCES GET MISSED WHEN LEGISLATION IS BEING DRAFTED? Note: The Home Department is the traditional name for the Home Office and the Home Secretary is technically the Secretary of State for the Home Department.   In this and other pieces I tend to use the titles interchangeably.   I hope that by confusing my readers I can distract them from the boring nature of the blog itself.   One part of my work lies in the field of research.   This is not well paid and is a somewhat lonely pastime, but I do enjoy the thrill of tracking down information in archives, dusty corners of the internet and guiding people around bits of London. I find that there is often an overlap between the past and present, indeed life is a continuum.    The present is a product of the past.   The influence of what has come before is often apparent in what is done today. Frequently to understand the modern operating context we have to get pa...

GWR Police and the Local Magistrates 1839

  Fig One:  Copy of Letter to the Reading Justices found in the correspondance of the Home Secretary 183 9 Last week I was at the National Archives working on some papers relating to an RAF Bomb Disposal Flight during the Second World War.   Naturally I found myself reading the Home Secretary’s correspondence file for 1839.   These research leaps will be very familiar to those who spend time in archives and libraries.   I have (mostly) given up researching the history of the railway police but it is hard to resist the temptation of surfing a catalogue and ordering a few extra files to pad out the task in hand.   On this occasion I found myself reading letters that had been sent to Lord John Russell (1) and in particular a of a letter sent by the Great Western Railway to the Justices of the Peace in Reading which had been copied to the Home Secretary. Fig Two:  Lord John Russell (1792-1878): later The Earl Russell.  Photo 1861. The early days of ...

The Oldest Railway Policeman?

                                            Photograph: Police Review and Parade Gossip 03 Sep 1897 In 1898 Superintendent James WRIGHT, Chief of the Great Central Railway Police, died.   He was 77 years old, (but see below). At the time of his death the newspapers proclaimed that he was the oldest serving railway policemen in the country.   It’s a well know fact that Superintendents have an easy life but 77 is a bit much, especially in a time when the average life expectancy for a male infant aged one year was 46.   Of course, life expectancy figures are skewed by high rates of infant mortality.   At birth James WRIGHT had a life expectancy of just 41 years. The railway police were not covered by the pension provisions of the Police Act 1890 and instead each railway company made its own arrangements with special benevolent funds bei...