Skip to main content

Pay Parity in the Early Days of Railway Policing

 




One of the great battles in the history of railway policing has been the pursuit of equality of pay and conditions with territorial forces.  Despite the Wright Committee Report in 1979 (which led to pay parity) there is still no statutory obligation on BTP to pay its officers the same as officers in other forces.  Indeed the allowances and pension arrangements are still not as generous.  As recently as 2018 claims supported by the Superintendents’ Association of England and Wales for back pay of allowances to ensure parity was rejected by the Chief Constable and Police Authority.

I was then rather pleased to read the Essex Standard of the 30 November 1838 which reported that the Directors of the Eastern Counties Railway (the pre-cursor to the Great Eastern Railway and then the LNER) had attended the Petty Sessions (Magistrates Court) at Ilford to update the Bench on their plans for policing.  The Justices were keen to know when police would be introduced on the line and where they would be stationed.  The Directors reported that the first officers were ready to be sworn under the ‘new act’.  This Act, the Eastern Counties Railways Act 1836, is an early example of legislation allowing the appointment of railway police.  In s241 the company was allowed to nominate Special Constables to the Justices ‘for the preservation of the peace and the security of persons and property’  Their powers to extend to 500 yards beyond the railway boundary.  The Directors produced the first officers to the court.  The policy of the company was that officers should have served in the forces and that ‘they were to be selected solely for their merits and character…and to be of quiet demeanour’.  The uniform consisted of ‘a blue coat and trousers with yellow facings to the coat and a leather belt around the waist’.  The new officers were sworn.  The Chairman of the bench addressed them and congratulated them upon their appointment.  He also enquired about pay and was told that the intention was that they were to be paid at the same rate as the Metropolitan Police.  The bench expressed their approbation at these arrangements and told the new recruits that ‘they would also find the bench ready to support them in any just cause they might bring before them’.

The railway itself didn’t open until 1839 and we don’t know the identity of the new officers, or their fate.  Perhaps a little more research will help fill in the gaps.  In the meantime it is good to see that equality of pay is nothing new for the railway police.

Philip Trendall

February 2023

 

 

"ILFORD PETTY SESSION." Essex Standard, 30 Nov. 1838. British Library Newspapers, link.gale.com/apps/doc/R3208401105/BNCN?u=anglia_itw&sid=bookmark-BNCN&xid=c1b8a64f. Accessed 9 Feb. 2023.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Do Non Home Department Police Forces Get Missed When Legislation is Being Drafted

  WHY DO NON HOME DEPARTMENT POLICE FORCES GET MISSED WHEN LEGISLATION IS BEING DRAFTED? Note: The Home Department is the traditional name for the Home Office and the Home Secretary is technically the Secretary of State for the Home Department.   In this and other pieces I tend to use the titles interchangeably.   I hope that by confusing my readers I can distract them from the boring nature of the blog itself.   One part of my work lies in the field of research.   This is not well paid and is a somewhat lonely pastime, but I do enjoy the thrill of tracking down information in archives, dusty corners of the internet and guiding people around bits of London. I find that there is often an overlap between the past and present, indeed life is a continuum.    The present is a product of the past.   The influence of what has come before is often apparent in what is done today. Frequently to understand the modern operating context we have to get pa...
Post a Comment
Read more

GWR Police and the Local Magistrates 1839

  Fig One:  Copy of Letter to the Reading Justices found in the correspondance of the Home Secretary 183 9 Last week I was at the National Archives working on some papers relating to an RAF Bomb Disposal Flight during the Second World War.   Naturally I found myself reading the Home Secretary’s correspondence file for 1839.   These research leaps will be very familiar to those who spend time in archives and libraries.   I have (mostly) given up researching the history of the railway police but it is hard to resist the temptation of surfing a catalogue and ordering a few extra files to pad out the task in hand.   On this occasion I found myself reading letters that had been sent to Lord John Russell (1) and in particular a of a letter sent by the Great Western Railway to the Justices of the Peace in Reading which had been copied to the Home Secretary. Fig Two:  Lord John Russell (1792-1878): later The Earl Russell.  Photo 1861. The early days of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Second World War 3: A Letter From a Cocked hat

                                       LNER Police Dog Handlers Carrying Revolvers at Hull 1941 (Photo BTPHG) Stories get passed down from generation to generation and often get changed on the way.   Often though, when the evidence is examined, our valued stories are found to be gross distortions of what actually happened.   I was therefore rather pleased recently to have one of these tales of Railway, Dock and Canal (RDC) policing to be fully based in fact. In 2011/12 I led   the project to re-introduce armed policing to BTP.   It was a challenging task that required attention to lots of different issues – not least the need to get the law changed to allow BTP officers to have firearms at all.   The project left me with an interest into the history of armed policing and in the legal position of the RDC police forces. T...
Post a Comment
Read more