Skip to main content

Pay Parity in the Early Days of Railway Policing

 




One of the great battles in the history of railway policing has been the pursuit of equality of pay and conditions with territorial forces.  Despite the Wright Committee Report in 1979 (which led to pay parity) there is still no statutory obligation on BTP to pay its officers the same as officers in other forces.  Indeed the allowances and pension arrangements are still not as generous.  As recently as 2018 claims supported by the Superintendents’ Association of England and Wales for back pay of allowances to ensure parity was rejected by the Chief Constable and Police Authority.

I was then rather pleased to read the Essex Standard of the 30 November 1838 which reported that the Directors of the Eastern Counties Railway (the pre-cursor to the Great Eastern Railway and then the LNER) had attended the Petty Sessions (Magistrates Court) at Ilford to update the Bench on their plans for policing.  The Justices were keen to know when police would be introduced on the line and where they would be stationed.  The Directors reported that the first officers were ready to be sworn under the ‘new act’.  This Act, the Eastern Counties Railways Act 1836, is an early example of legislation allowing the appointment of railway police.  In s241 the company was allowed to nominate Special Constables to the Justices ‘for the preservation of the peace and the security of persons and property’  Their powers to extend to 500 yards beyond the railway boundary.  The Directors produced the first officers to the court.  The policy of the company was that officers should have served in the forces and that ‘they were to be selected solely for their merits and character…and to be of quiet demeanour’.  The uniform consisted of ‘a blue coat and trousers with yellow facings to the coat and a leather belt around the waist’.  The new officers were sworn.  The Chairman of the bench addressed them and congratulated them upon their appointment.  He also enquired about pay and was told that the intention was that they were to be paid at the same rate as the Metropolitan Police.  The bench expressed their approbation at these arrangements and told the new recruits that ‘they would also find the bench ready to support them in any just cause they might bring before them’.

The railway itself didn’t open until 1839 and we don’t know the identity of the new officers, or their fate.  Perhaps a little more research will help fill in the gaps.  In the meantime it is good to see that equality of pay is nothing new for the railway police.

Philip Trendall

February 2023

 

 

"ILFORD PETTY SESSION." Essex Standard, 30 Nov. 1838. British Library Newspapers, link.gale.com/apps/doc/R3208401105/BNCN?u=anglia_itw&sid=bookmark-BNCN&xid=c1b8a64f. Accessed 9 Feb. 2023.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Give me a firm place to stand.........

  Is policing better today than it was 50 years ago?   Is this even a valid question?   My answer to both is   straightforward: ‘I don’t know’.   I suspect that most things are better and some things have declined but generally it is the sort of question that can take up a lot of time and enough hot air to power a dirigible.   I really DON’T want to start a debate on this because what concerns me most is my own shifting perspective.   As a grumpy git I find the sight of scruffy police officers looking bored and staring at their telephones really annoying.   I don’t understand why wearing a traditional helmet is so difficult and I don’t like the rather lightweight approach to discipline.   On the other hand my professional dealings with police officers show me that modern officers are bright, caring, thoughtful and determined to do the right thing.   As events demonstrate there is no shortage of brave people in today’s service. The horrors of racism and misogyny still haunt the service
Post a Comment
Read more

Law and History 2: JUST THE SAME AS OTHER FORCES?

  Reading through this before posting makes me fear that it is not historical enough for this blog and trespasses into contemporary issues.   So be it.   But I do feel it necessary to remind readers that this blog does NOT represent the view of the BTPHG.   These ramblings are mine alone. It is rarely accurate to say that history repeats itself, but it is true that somethings that we think are settled in the past return to challenge us again. When I was a serving police officer in BTP I saw a steady evolution in the status of the force.   The achievements of officers, particularly in facing the ‘decade of disasters’ (1980s) and the acknowledged expertise of BTP in dealing with certain classes of activity (terrorism, theft person, theft of goods in transit, major incident response, football disorder etc) all led to an increasing recognition that BTP was an equal member of the police family.   In concrete terms this had been marked by the recommendation of the Wright Committee into the
1 comment
Read more

Police Review & Parade Gossip 1902/3

  I have, at long last, returned to my project of searching early editions of Police Review & Parade Gossip for items relating to the Rail, Dock and Canal (RDC) Policing.   I have run into a couple of years where the index (which was compiled at the end of end calendar year) is missing which means I have had no choice but to go through every page of every edition.   Police Review was a weekly publication that described itself as ‘The Organ of the British Constabulary’.   It provides a valuable insight into the issues that concerned police officers and the public. So, what were the big questions of the early Edwardian period?   Well, questions of law make a frequent appearance together with operational demands.   The delay to the Coronation of Edward VII in 1902 (he was ill) led to a lot of operational angst.   Even today mutual aid brings challenges but imagine what it was like when there were 243 forces (i) covering England, Scotland and Wales.   Assaults on officers were at a v
Post a Comment
Read more