Skip to main content

A Singular Fraud....

 

Police Misconduct has been a problem since the very beginning of policing.  One particular type – that of making false claims – has persisted for generations.  Most supervisory officers will have had cause to look carefully at timesheets and to doubt the honesty of some claims of sickness.  To lend proper support to officers without giving licence to the dishonest and the idle is one of the challenges of police management.

In 1903 Pc William PARK of the Lancs and Yorks Railway police (based at Liverpool Exchange) claimed that he had injured himself when inspecting premises on his beat.  He sustained a serious injury and cuts to his hand.  He was able to claim on the insurance fund and received half pay.  Over a period of several months he received a total of £7.   Unfortunately for him the company discovered (by what means we do not know) that he was lying about the cause of his injuries.  Evidence was obtained that he had in fact been performing a trick with two beer bottles in a local pub when one broke causing the wounds that were the basis of his claim.

He was charged with Obtaining Money by False Pretences and appeared before the Stipendiary Magistrate.  He pleaded guilty and drew attention to his good character and military service.  He asked for leniency on the basis that he had to support his wife and child and that his hand would be ‘crippled for life’.  The court sentenced him to 2 months in prison.

PARK had found himself in a difficult position.  If he had been honest he would not have been entitled to any sick pay or compensation and he was unable to work.  By lying he lost his freedom, character and employment.

 

Philip Trendall

October 2023

 

Notes

Liverpool Evening Express 23 March 1903 p5

Supplement to the Manchester Courier 28 March 1903 p3

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Do Non Home Department Police Forces Get Missed When Legislation is Being Drafted

  WHY DO NON HOME DEPARTMENT POLICE FORCES GET MISSED WHEN LEGISLATION IS BEING DRAFTED? Note: The Home Department is the traditional name for the Home Office and the Home Secretary is technically the Secretary of State for the Home Department.   In this and other pieces I tend to use the titles interchangeably.   I hope that by confusing my readers I can distract them from the boring nature of the blog itself.   One part of my work lies in the field of research.   This is not well paid and is a somewhat lonely pastime, but I do enjoy the thrill of tracking down information in archives, dusty corners of the internet and guiding people around bits of London. I find that there is often an overlap between the past and present, indeed life is a continuum.    The present is a product of the past.   The influence of what has come before is often apparent in what is done today. Frequently to understand the modern operating context we have to get pa...

GWR Police and the Local Magistrates 1839

  Fig One:  Copy of Letter to the Reading Justices found in the correspondance of the Home Secretary 183 9 Last week I was at the National Archives working on some papers relating to an RAF Bomb Disposal Flight during the Second World War.   Naturally I found myself reading the Home Secretary’s correspondence file for 1839.   These research leaps will be very familiar to those who spend time in archives and libraries.   I have (mostly) given up researching the history of the railway police but it is hard to resist the temptation of surfing a catalogue and ordering a few extra files to pad out the task in hand.   On this occasion I found myself reading letters that had been sent to Lord John Russell (1) and in particular a of a letter sent by the Great Western Railway to the Justices of the Peace in Reading which had been copied to the Home Secretary. Fig Two:  Lord John Russell (1792-1878): later The Earl Russell.  Photo 1861. The early days of ...

The Oldest Railway Policeman?

                                            Photograph: Police Review and Parade Gossip 03 Sep 1897 In 1898 Superintendent James WRIGHT, Chief of the Great Central Railway Police, died.   He was 77 years old, (but see below). At the time of his death the newspapers proclaimed that he was the oldest serving railway policemen in the country.   It’s a well know fact that Superintendents have an easy life but 77 is a bit much, especially in a time when the average life expectancy for a male infant aged one year was 46.   Of course, life expectancy figures are skewed by high rates of infant mortality.   At birth James WRIGHT had a life expectancy of just 41 years. The railway police were not covered by the pension provisions of the Police Act 1890 and instead each railway company made its own arrangements with special benevolent funds bei...