Skip to main content

A Singular Fraud....

 

Police Misconduct has been a problem since the very beginning of policing.  One particular type – that of making false claims – has persisted for generations.  Most supervisory officers will have had cause to look carefully at timesheets and to doubt the honesty of some claims of sickness.  To lend proper support to officers without giving licence to the dishonest and the idle is one of the challenges of police management.

In 1903 Pc William PARK of the Lancs and Yorks Railway police (based at Liverpool Exchange) claimed that he had injured himself when inspecting premises on his beat.  He sustained a serious injury and cuts to his hand.  He was able to claim on the insurance fund and received half pay.  Over a period of several months he received a total of £7.   Unfortunately for him the company discovered (by what means we do not know) that he was lying about the cause of his injuries.  Evidence was obtained that he had in fact been performing a trick with two beer bottles in a local pub when one broke causing the wounds that were the basis of his claim.

He was charged with Obtaining Money by False Pretences and appeared before the Stipendiary Magistrate.  He pleaded guilty and drew attention to his good character and military service.  He asked for leniency on the basis that he had to support his wife and child and that his hand would be ‘crippled for life’.  The court sentenced him to 2 months in prison.

PARK had found himself in a difficult position.  If he had been honest he would not have been entitled to any sick pay or compensation and he was unable to work.  By lying he lost his freedom, character and employment.

 

Philip Trendall

October 2023

 

Notes

Liverpool Evening Express 23 March 1903 p5

Supplement to the Manchester Courier 28 March 1903 p3

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Give me a firm place to stand.........

  Is policing better today than it was 50 years ago?   Is this even a valid question?   My answer to both is   straightforward: ‘I don’t know’.   I suspect that most things are better and some things have declined but generally it is the sort of question that can take up a lot of time and enough hot air to power a dirigible.   I really DON’T want to start a debate on this because what concerns me most is my own shifting perspective.   As a grumpy git I find the sight of scruffy police officers looking bored and staring at their telephones really annoying.   I don’t understand why wearing a traditional helmet is so difficult and I don’t like the rather lightweight approach to discipline.   On the other hand my professional dealings with police officers show me that modern officers are bright, caring, thoughtful and determined to do the right thing.   As events demonstrate there is no shortage of brave people in today’s service. The horror...

Films for Thought

  While searching the index to the material held by the Imperial War Museum (IWM) I stumbled across a couple of items relevant to this blog.   Film footage can sometimes feel like a peep hole into the past.   Each individual that appears would have had their own story to tell.   Perhaps this is a theme I will return to in relation to the footage which catches – sometimes only in passing – railway, dock or canal police officers. The two IWM clips that caught my eye were: A 1942 film showing war work being carried out by women on the Southern Railway.   Includes a shot of a member of WPC, Southern Railway Police directing traffic at Waterloo.   The commentary reflects the social assumptions of the time.   https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/1060021182   A silent 1940 film about the evacuation of children.   Shows footage at the front of St Pancras Station with police officers including an LMS Sergeant. https://www.iwm.org...

Law and History 2: JUST THE SAME AS OTHER FORCES?

  Reading through this before posting makes me fear that it is not historical enough for this blog and trespasses into contemporary issues.   So be it.   But I do feel it necessary to remind readers that this blog does NOT represent the view of the BTPHG.   These ramblings are mine alone. It is rarely accurate to say that history repeats itself, but it is true that somethings that we think are settled in the past return to challenge us again. When I was a serving police officer in BTP I saw a steady evolution in the status of the force.   The achievements of officers, particularly in facing the ‘decade of disasters’ (1980s) and the acknowledged expertise of BTP in dealing with certain classes of activity (terrorism, theft person, theft of goods in transit, major incident response, football disorder etc) all led to an increasing recognition that BTP was an equal member of the police family.   In concrete terms this had been marked by the recommendation of ...