Skip to main content

The History of Jurisdiction - A Small Example from the Great War

 

The attitude of local forces to BTP and its predecessor forces has always been rather mixed.  In recent years I rarely have cause to tell groups I work with that I once served in BTP.  As they are mostly police officers I am speaking to their reaction to mention of the railway police (current and historic) is often negative.  I have always found the Police History Society rather sniffy about the history of the railway and dock police.  Somehow in the minds of many the sacrifice of railway, dock and canal police does quite score so highly as that to be found in other forces. 

In one respect geographic forces were (and perhaps still are) united.  That is in opposing any extension of the powers of RDC officers. The fact that officers from other geographic forces have powers in their area does not seem to offer any threat but the prospect of RDC officers exercising the power of constable on their patch might bring about the end of civilisation.  Of course even now local officers have full powers on railway premises.

I am currently working on an example of this in relation to the policing of London buses but I came across another example today.  The demands placed on police forces at the start of Great War in 1914 were dramatic.  Thousands of ordinary people were signed up as Special Constables across virtually all forces.  Newspapers are full of reports of their faltering first steps in policing.  But even in this environment the prospect of the railway police trespassing on the streets could cause consternation.

Police Review & Parade Gossip (‘The Organ of the British Constabulary’) of 5th February 1915 reports that Manchester City Council had heard that the Great Central Railway Bill that was soon to go before Parliament would include provision for railway constables to have powers within half a mile of railway premises. The Council were outraged by the prospect and calculated that railway constables would have powers in nearly a third of the city.  The matter was brought to the attention of the Watch Committee and officers of the authority were instructed to object to the proposal.

The objection was successful and the Great Central Railway Act 1915 contains no mention of the powers of constables.

By 1915 the powers of most RDC officers were limited to railway premises with a power of ‘follow and arrest’ outwith the same.  Early Acts of Parliament that granted more extensive geographical powers had largely been replaced. The power ‘in the vicinity’ was not introduced until 1960s and was lost in 2003.  Powers to deal with matters effecting the railway (etc) off railway premises came in the last quarter of the 20th century and remains in place.

 

Phil Trendall

January 2024

 

REFERENCES

Police Review and Parade Gossip 5th February 1915 P62

Great Central Railway Act 1915

 

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Do Non Home Department Police Forces Get Missed When Legislation is Being Drafted

  WHY DO NON HOME DEPARTMENT POLICE FORCES GET MISSED WHEN LEGISLATION IS BEING DRAFTED? Note: The Home Department is the traditional name for the Home Office and the Home Secretary is technically the Secretary of State for the Home Department.   In this and other pieces I tend to use the titles interchangeably.   I hope that by confusing my readers I can distract them from the boring nature of the blog itself.   One part of my work lies in the field of research.   This is not well paid and is a somewhat lonely pastime, but I do enjoy the thrill of tracking down information in archives, dusty corners of the internet and guiding people around bits of London. I find that there is often an overlap between the past and present, indeed life is a continuum.    The present is a product of the past.   The influence of what has come before is often apparent in what is done today. Frequently to understand the modern operating context we have to get pa...
Post a Comment
Read more

GWR Police and the Local Magistrates 1839

  Fig One:  Copy of Letter to the Reading Justices found in the correspondance of the Home Secretary 183 9 Last week I was at the National Archives working on some papers relating to an RAF Bomb Disposal Flight during the Second World War.   Naturally I found myself reading the Home Secretary’s correspondence file for 1839.   These research leaps will be very familiar to those who spend time in archives and libraries.   I have (mostly) given up researching the history of the railway police but it is hard to resist the temptation of surfing a catalogue and ordering a few extra files to pad out the task in hand.   On this occasion I found myself reading letters that had been sent to Lord John Russell (1) and in particular a of a letter sent by the Great Western Railway to the Justices of the Peace in Reading which had been copied to the Home Secretary. Fig Two:  Lord John Russell (1792-1878): later The Earl Russell.  Photo 1861. The early days of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Second World War 3: A Letter From a Cocked hat

                                       LNER Police Dog Handlers Carrying Revolvers at Hull 1941 (Photo BTPHG) Stories get passed down from generation to generation and often get changed on the way.   Often though, when the evidence is examined, our valued stories are found to be gross distortions of what actually happened.   I was therefore rather pleased recently to have one of these tales of Railway, Dock and Canal (RDC) policing to be fully based in fact. In 2011/12 I led   the project to re-introduce armed policing to BTP.   It was a challenging task that required attention to lots of different issues – not least the need to get the law changed to allow BTP officers to have firearms at all.   The project left me with an interest into the history of armed policing and in the legal position of the RDC police forces. T...
Post a Comment
Read more