Skip to main content

The Railway Police as Witnesses: 1939

 

At a hearing of the North London Juvenile Court in early 1939 the Chairman told the court that “railway police evidence is proverbially unreliable”.  The case involved two boys charged with causing damage to property belonging to the London Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS).  We do not know the outcome of the case or the details of alleged offence. 

The comments from the bench caused outrage.  Police Review ran a piece by Jack Hayes, their Parliamentary Correspondent, which decried the comments and suggested that they …”make an invidious distinction between the railway police and the regular police”.  He describes the difficult duties that fall to the railway police and ends by saying:  “I have always found the railway police good fellows, courteous and obliging, attentive to their duties, and with these qualities they are as good as anyone else as witnesses in a court of law”.

Fifty years later I recall a BTP officer making an application for a warrant at the Guildhall Justice Rooms in the City of London.  The Chairman of the bench asked if there was a ‘normal’ police officer who could be sworn to support the information as he was not content with the evidence of a ‘railway policeman’.  The officer politely declined the suggestion and withdraw the information. He walked over to Clerkenwell Magistrates Court and obtained the warrant under the hand of the Stipendiary (a District Judge in modern terms).

Back in 1939 the Chairman of the Juvenile Bench did withdraw his comments and apologise.  This might have been connected with the fact that although the LMS was the victim, the prosecution was mounted by, and the police witnesses were from, the Metropolitan Police.

Jack HAYES (1887-1941), the outraged author of the parliamentary column in Police Review was a former Member of Parliament.  He had been General Secretary of the National Union of Police and Prison Officers after resigning from the Metropolitan Police in which he had served as a sergeant.  The Union was effectively banned in 1919.  He was the first ex police officer to sit in the House of Commons.  

 

Phil Trendall

January 2024

 

NOTES

 

Police Review 24 March 1939 p 278

 

Jack Hayes:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Hayes_(politician)  


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Give me a firm place to stand.........

  Is policing better today than it was 50 years ago?   Is this even a valid question?   My answer to both is   straightforward: ‘I don’t know’.   I suspect that most things are better and some things have declined but generally it is the sort of question that can take up a lot of time and enough hot air to power a dirigible.   I really DON’T want to start a debate on this because what concerns me most is my own shifting perspective.   As a grumpy git I find the sight of scruffy police officers looking bored and staring at their telephones really annoying.   I don’t understand why wearing a traditional helmet is so difficult and I don’t like the rather lightweight approach to discipline.   On the other hand my professional dealings with police officers show me that modern officers are bright, caring, thoughtful and determined to do the right thing.   As events demonstrate there is no shortage of brave people in today’s service. The horror...
Post a Comment
Read more

Films for Thought

  While searching the index to the material held by the Imperial War Museum (IWM) I stumbled across a couple of items relevant to this blog.   Film footage can sometimes feel like a peep hole into the past.   Each individual that appears would have had their own story to tell.   Perhaps this is a theme I will return to in relation to the footage which catches – sometimes only in passing – railway, dock or canal police officers. The two IWM clips that caught my eye were: A 1942 film showing war work being carried out by women on the Southern Railway.   Includes a shot of a member of WPC, Southern Railway Police directing traffic at Waterloo.   The commentary reflects the social assumptions of the time.   https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/1060021182   A silent 1940 film about the evacuation of children.   Shows footage at the front of St Pancras Station with police officers including an LMS Sergeant. https://www.iwm.org...
2 comments
Read more

Law and History 2: JUST THE SAME AS OTHER FORCES?

  Reading through this before posting makes me fear that it is not historical enough for this blog and trespasses into contemporary issues.   So be it.   But I do feel it necessary to remind readers that this blog does NOT represent the view of the BTPHG.   These ramblings are mine alone. It is rarely accurate to say that history repeats itself, but it is true that somethings that we think are settled in the past return to challenge us again. When I was a serving police officer in BTP I saw a steady evolution in the status of the force.   The achievements of officers, particularly in facing the ‘decade of disasters’ (1980s) and the acknowledged expertise of BTP in dealing with certain classes of activity (terrorism, theft person, theft of goods in transit, major incident response, football disorder etc) all led to an increasing recognition that BTP was an equal member of the police family.   In concrete terms this had been marked by the recommendation of ...
1 comment
Read more