Skip to main content

The Railway Police as Witnesses: 1939

 

At a hearing of the North London Juvenile Court in early 1939 the Chairman told the court that “railway police evidence is proverbially unreliable”.  The case involved two boys charged with causing damage to property belonging to the London Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS).  We do not know the outcome of the case or the details of alleged offence. 

The comments from the bench caused outrage.  Police Review ran a piece by Jack Hayes, their Parliamentary Correspondent, which decried the comments and suggested that they …”make an invidious distinction between the railway police and the regular police”.  He describes the difficult duties that fall to the railway police and ends by saying:  “I have always found the railway police good fellows, courteous and obliging, attentive to their duties, and with these qualities they are as good as anyone else as witnesses in a court of law”.

Fifty years later I recall a BTP officer making an application for a warrant at the Guildhall Justice Rooms in the City of London.  The Chairman of the bench asked if there was a ‘normal’ police officer who could be sworn to support the information as he was not content with the evidence of a ‘railway policeman’.  The officer politely declined the suggestion and withdraw the information. He walked over to Clerkenwell Magistrates Court and obtained the warrant under the hand of the Stipendiary (a District Judge in modern terms).

Back in 1939 the Chairman of the Juvenile Bench did withdraw his comments and apologise.  This might have been connected with the fact that although the LMS was the victim, the prosecution was mounted by, and the police witnesses were from, the Metropolitan Police.

Jack HAYES (1887-1941), the outraged author of the parliamentary column in Police Review was a former Member of Parliament.  He had been General Secretary of the National Union of Police and Prison Officers after resigning from the Metropolitan Police in which he had served as a sergeant.  The Union was effectively banned in 1919.  He was the first ex police officer to sit in the House of Commons.  

 

Phil Trendall

January 2024

 

NOTES

 

Police Review 24 March 1939 p 278

 

Jack Hayes:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Hayes_(politician)  


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Give me a firm place to stand.........

  Is policing better today than it was 50 years ago?   Is this even a valid question?   My answer to both is   straightforward: ‘I don’t know’.   I suspect that most things are better and some things have declined but generally it is the sort of question that can take up a lot of time and enough hot air to power a dirigible.   I really DON’T want to start a debate on this because what concerns me most is my own shifting perspective.   As a grumpy git I find the sight of scruffy police officers looking bored and staring at their telephones really annoying.   I don’t understand why wearing a traditional helmet is so difficult and I don’t like the rather lightweight approach to discipline.   On the other hand my professional dealings with police officers show me that modern officers are bright, caring, thoughtful and determined to do the right thing.   As events demonstrate there is no shortage of brave people in today’s service. The horrors of racism and misogyny still haunt the service
Post a Comment
Read more

Law and History 2: JUST THE SAME AS OTHER FORCES?

  Reading through this before posting makes me fear that it is not historical enough for this blog and trespasses into contemporary issues.   So be it.   But I do feel it necessary to remind readers that this blog does NOT represent the view of the BTPHG.   These ramblings are mine alone. It is rarely accurate to say that history repeats itself, but it is true that somethings that we think are settled in the past return to challenge us again. When I was a serving police officer in BTP I saw a steady evolution in the status of the force.   The achievements of officers, particularly in facing the ‘decade of disasters’ (1980s) and the acknowledged expertise of BTP in dealing with certain classes of activity (terrorism, theft person, theft of goods in transit, major incident response, football disorder etc) all led to an increasing recognition that BTP was an equal member of the police family.   In concrete terms this had been marked by the recommendation of the Wright Committee into the
1 comment
Read more

Police Review & Parade Gossip 1902/3

  I have, at long last, returned to my project of searching early editions of Police Review & Parade Gossip for items relating to the Rail, Dock and Canal (RDC) Policing.   I have run into a couple of years where the index (which was compiled at the end of end calendar year) is missing which means I have had no choice but to go through every page of every edition.   Police Review was a weekly publication that described itself as ‘The Organ of the British Constabulary’.   It provides a valuable insight into the issues that concerned police officers and the public. So, what were the big questions of the early Edwardian period?   Well, questions of law make a frequent appearance together with operational demands.   The delay to the Coronation of Edward VII in 1902 (he was ill) led to a lot of operational angst.   Even today mutual aid brings challenges but imagine what it was like when there were 243 forces (i) covering England, Scotland and Wales.   Assaults on officers were at a v
Post a Comment
Read more