Skip to main content

There is Power in a Union........The Case of Pc FAIRWEATHER

 


The new road named after Lord Hamilton of the Great Eastern Railway


The newish road outside Hertford East railway Station is named after a former chairman of the Great Eastern Railway; Claud HAMILTON.  I recall that there was a large building at Liverpool Street Station (demolished in the 1980s) that was also named after him.  His reputation looms large in railway history.  He was also a Member of Parliament and a peer.  When I see the new road sign I think not of Hamilton himself but of his role in a sorry tale that led to a well respected railway policeman losing his job.

We often celebrate the coming of the police federation in general and the railway police federation in particular.  The early pioneers of representation faced many challenges but were only allowed to exist because of the chaos brought about by agitation in the police service after the First World War.  The idea that police officers could be members of trades unions seems alien to us now.  But the low paid and much put upon officers of the early twentieth century saw no conflict of interest.  Indeed police union membership is common in many other democracies even now. 

The National Union of Police and Prison Officers admitted members of the railway police as did other unions.  In the lead up to the Great War the morale of railway police officers was poor.  Pay and conditions of service were bad.  The pages of Police Review and Parade Gossip magazine frequently carried letters from officers pointing out their plight.  For example a lengthy correspondence in early 1914 complained that police on the Midland Railway received less pay than a passenger porter, frequently suffered assaults, changes in duties and were required to work unpaid overtime.

In the same year some officers in the Great Eastern Railway Police (GER) joined the railway union and tried to form a section for police officers.  Relative to other railway forces the GER were reasonably paid and had some decent equipment.  However their terms were harsh when compared to railway workers and their pay was less than that received by Metropolitan Police officers, this being a problem for GER officers in the Metropolis, which then, as now, was an expensive place to live.

Pc Walter J FAIRWEATHER lived in West Ham (London) but was originally from Suffolk.  In 1914 he had been a railway policeman for around eight years, having previously served in the Royal Navy.  He was married with two young children.  The 1911 census tells us that another child died young.  FAIRWEATHER was 36 at the time of his clash with Lord HAMILTON.  During the early part of the year he advised the Chief of Police for the GER (Major CHAUNCEY) that he had convened a meeting of those officers who wished to organise as part of their trade union.  The Chief of Police advised him that such a gathering was not compatible with his role as a police officer and that he would suffer consequences if such a meeting took place.  The meeting went ahead but FAIRWEATHER did not act as chair because of the Chief’s warning.  However he was dismissed from the service.

Very quickly the union mobilised and threatened strike action by all staff across the GER network.  The company refused to re-instate FAIRWEATHER but sought a compromise whereby he would be offered a job as a goods porter at Hertford (now Hertford East) station on a much lower wage than he was receiving as a police officer.  He declined the offer on the grounds that he could not support his family on such a wage and that it was a long way from home. 

To avert the prospect of a strike FAIRWEATHER was allowed to put his case before the Board of Directors of the GER.  At the meeting he claimed that every citizen has a right to combine in a union and he rejected the offer of a low paid job many miles from where he lived.  The union gave a notice of a full railway strike on the GER.  This was enough to attract media attention with dozens of articles appearing in the newspapers.  It also brought the matter to the attention of the Labour Party, a growing force in Parliament.

Labour saw their opportunity during the passage of the Great Eastern Railway Bill (1914).  This was a one of the hundreds of private Bills sponsored by railway companies and was seen as a routine piece of legislation.  Several MPs raised the case of Pc FAIRWEATHER during the debate.  Lord HAMILTON responded in a robust manner that discipline in the police was vital and that he would not allow the officer to be allowed back.  A last minute compromise was suggested by Ramsay MacDonald, the MP for Leicester and future Prime Minister.  He asked if a job could be found within the GER that paid the same as FAIRWEATHER was receiving as a police constable.  HAMILTON refused.  As a consequence the Bill was voted down by a sizable majority of 140 to 62 – the result being met with cheers in the House.   This was an inconvenience to the GER, but the victory was short lived and the Great Eastern Railway Act became law in 1915.

World events overtook the dispute.  In August 1914 Walter FAIRWEATHER volunteered and rejoined the navy.  He survived the war and in 1921 he was at home with his family in West Ham.  Someone must have had a change of heart because he was working for the GER in the Goods department at the depot at Stratford Market, a short walk from his home (a site now occupied by the Jubilee Line).  But he was not a porter, but a foreman. This was a job that was better paid than that of a railway constable.  Meanwhile in 1918/19 police officers from several forces, including the Metropolitan force, had gone on strike because of their pay and conditions and for the right to be members of a trade union.  That there is power in a union is shown by the fact that when the Metropolitan Police went on strike their claims were settled in 24 hours.  The only point of failure was the government’s determination to supress the union itself.

I think we should remember Walter FAIRWEATHER.  A man who stood up for the rights of police officers.  Perhaps the road outside the station he refused to work at should be named after him rather than the boss who denied the right of police officers to combine together.

 

Phil Trendall

January 2024

 

NOTES

With apologies to Mr B Bragg.  The original There is power in a union song was written by Joe Hill in 1913.


 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Give me a firm place to stand.........

  Is policing better today than it was 50 years ago?   Is this even a valid question?   My answer to both is   straightforward: ‘I don’t know’.   I suspect that most things are better and some things have declined but generally it is the sort of question that can take up a lot of time and enough hot air to power a dirigible.   I really DON’T want to start a debate on this because what concerns me most is my own shifting perspective.   As a grumpy git I find the sight of scruffy police officers looking bored and staring at their telephones really annoying.   I don’t understand why wearing a traditional helmet is so difficult and I don’t like the rather lightweight approach to discipline.   On the other hand my professional dealings with police officers show me that modern officers are bright, caring, thoughtful and determined to do the right thing.   As events demonstrate there is no shortage of brave people in today’s service. The horrors of racism and misogyny still haunt the service

Law and History 2: JUST THE SAME AS OTHER FORCES?

  Reading through this before posting makes me fear that it is not historical enough for this blog and trespasses into contemporary issues.   So be it.   But I do feel it necessary to remind readers that this blog does NOT represent the view of the BTPHG.   These ramblings are mine alone. It is rarely accurate to say that history repeats itself, but it is true that somethings that we think are settled in the past return to challenge us again. When I was a serving police officer in BTP I saw a steady evolution in the status of the force.   The achievements of officers, particularly in facing the ‘decade of disasters’ (1980s) and the acknowledged expertise of BTP in dealing with certain classes of activity (terrorism, theft person, theft of goods in transit, major incident response, football disorder etc) all led to an increasing recognition that BTP was an equal member of the police family.   In concrete terms this had been marked by the recommendation of the Wright Committee into the

Police Review & Parade Gossip 1902/3

  I have, at long last, returned to my project of searching early editions of Police Review & Parade Gossip for items relating to the Rail, Dock and Canal (RDC) Policing.   I have run into a couple of years where the index (which was compiled at the end of end calendar year) is missing which means I have had no choice but to go through every page of every edition.   Police Review was a weekly publication that described itself as ‘The Organ of the British Constabulary’.   It provides a valuable insight into the issues that concerned police officers and the public. So, what were the big questions of the early Edwardian period?   Well, questions of law make a frequent appearance together with operational demands.   The delay to the Coronation of Edward VII in 1902 (he was ill) led to a lot of operational angst.   Even today mutual aid brings challenges but imagine what it was like when there were 243 forces (i) covering England, Scotland and Wales.   Assaults on officers were at a v