Skip to main content

Some General Thoughts in the Context of The King’s Cross Fire (38 Years On)

 




In Memory of the 31 People Who Lost Their Lives And To the Hundreds of Others Who Suffered Because of the Fire

King's Cross 18th November 2025


Some General Thoughts in the Context of The King’s Cross Fire (38 Years On)

It strikes me that officers of the British Transport Police, and its ancestor forces, have probably attended more major incidents than any other police force of a similar size.  It is therefore sad that we lack a comprehensive set of personal accounts from officers who attended these dreadful events.  From the many train crashes, terrorist outrages and wars of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries through to the continued terrorist attacks and the pandemic of the 21st century I have seen but a handful of recollections written by the officers who were actually involved in these massive events in our history.

These big events result in the production of vast amounts of formal paperwork which is very useful to the historian and to those whose job it is to ensure that the lessons of the past have been properly learnt.   But official documents can only tell part of the story.  The railway and dock police have tackled events that should not be forgotten.  To exclude the individual experiences of officers is to allow the past to be partially forgotten.

I am mindful of the traumatic nature of many of the events in this category of policing.  Many former officers carry the weight of what they saw and did and will do so for the rest of their lives.  Their contribution needs to be remembered too.

All of the above thoughts came to me today because I attended the annual wreath laying in remembrance of the King’s Cross Fire.  In the last couple of years the service has been run by the London Fire Brigade and today they did a splendid job in remembering Colin Townsley, the firefighter who lost his life trying to save others.  There was a parade of operational firefighters and another of fire cadets who are taught about the importance of the fire in the development of modern firefighting.  The quiet dignity of those that lost loved ones is difficult to behold.  For them 38 years is nothing,  for the disaster can seem like it happened  yesterday.  London Underground staff also took part together with the Mayor of Camden.  I was disappointed that there was no representative of BTP as it was an event that always used to be carefully marked by the force.  I was proud to lay a wreath for several years when I was at FHQ.  I think that BTP  officers attend to lay a wreath outside of the formal ceremony.

Looking back on 1987 I recall that I only attended several hours into the incident. I role could not have been more minor.  I had been at court that day but the rest of my shift were deeply involved.   The Fire shook BTP in a way that no other event had in modern times, that is until the attacks of 2005.  I well recall the changes that overcame my colleagues who had witnessed the Fire unfold.  Colleagues that had bravely attempted to save lives.  Colleagues that had sustained serious physical and mental injuries.  Colleagues who conducted a first class investigation (one of the first to be subject to a formal review by another force) in appalling conditions.  I remember the force becoming the leader in working with academia and the NHS to support officers – not something that lasted I’m afraid.  Many officers rose to the leadership challenge that confronted the force in the aftermath and in the lead up to the Public Inquiry.  I recall the efforts of Sue Jones and others.

 Of course I knew only a small proportion of the officers involved.  My knowledge is partial and probably distorted

Sixteen years after the fire I was very privileged to be part of the team that identified the last unknown victim of the fire.  It was one of the defining moments of my otherwise lacklustre career. My task was to read all the paperwork and reports, to check all the photographs and statements, and to liaise with the coroner, pathologists, scientists and the Home Office.  Under the leadership of Nick Bracken we were able to close a chapter in our history and, more importantly, to bring some comfort to a bereaved family who had waited many years to know what had happened to their Father.   I well recall the indefatigable work by Ian Wilkinson in finding answers to difficult questions.

In more recent years I have read the papers in the National Archives, including the evidence considered by the Public Inquiry. As an aside the papers are informative about how government and other agencies viewed BTP.  The determination of senior officers such as Ian McGregor to make sure that the force had a voice is of some importance in the story of the force.   It is a sad fact that tragedies such as King’s Cross have greatly enhanced the reputation of BTP and that experience gained in adversity has added greatly to the corporate knowledge that has been passed down to the modern generation of officers and staff.

But, to return to my original point.  Time is (always) running out.  I would make a plea to all former (and indeed serving) BTP officers to commit to paper their memories of their involvement in the major incidents that have dominated the last half century of BTP’s history.  There is no requirement for masterpieces of literature – just the truth and the story of what happened on the ground, during the investigation and in the aftermath.  Our history will be much richer if future generations can read first hand accounts.  Imagine if we had documents from the railway police who attended the Quitinshill disaster?  Or more memories of policing the railway and docks during the First and Second World Wars?  Personal stories may be painful to write but they are part of history.  On a practical level such records of  can be stored by the BTPHG – or they could be published on line, or they can be shared and kept within families. 

Let’s not forget the things that are important.

 

Phil Trendall

18th November 2025

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Do Non Home Department Police Forces Get Missed When Legislation is Being Drafted

  WHY DO NON HOME DEPARTMENT POLICE FORCES GET MISSED WHEN LEGISLATION IS BEING DRAFTED? Note: The Home Department is the traditional name for the Home Office and the Home Secretary is technically the Secretary of State for the Home Department.   In this and other pieces I tend to use the titles interchangeably.   I hope that by confusing my readers I can distract them from the boring nature of the blog itself.   One part of my work lies in the field of research.   This is not well paid and is a somewhat lonely pastime, but I do enjoy the thrill of tracking down information in archives, dusty corners of the internet and guiding people around bits of London. I find that there is often an overlap between the past and present, indeed life is a continuum.    The present is a product of the past.   The influence of what has come before is often apparent in what is done today. Frequently to understand the modern operating context we have to get pa...

GWR Police and the Local Magistrates 1839

  Fig One:  Copy of Letter to the Reading Justices found in the correspondance of the Home Secretary 183 9 Last week I was at the National Archives working on some papers relating to an RAF Bomb Disposal Flight during the Second World War.   Naturally I found myself reading the Home Secretary’s correspondence file for 1839.   These research leaps will be very familiar to those who spend time in archives and libraries.   I have (mostly) given up researching the history of the railway police but it is hard to resist the temptation of surfing a catalogue and ordering a few extra files to pad out the task in hand.   On this occasion I found myself reading letters that had been sent to Lord John Russell (1) and in particular a of a letter sent by the Great Western Railway to the Justices of the Peace in Reading which had been copied to the Home Secretary. Fig Two:  Lord John Russell (1792-1878): later The Earl Russell.  Photo 1861. The early days of ...

The Oldest Railway Policeman?

                                            Photograph: Police Review and Parade Gossip 03 Sep 1897 In 1898 Superintendent James WRIGHT, Chief of the Great Central Railway Police, died.   He was 77 years old, (but see below). At the time of his death the newspapers proclaimed that he was the oldest serving railway policemen in the country.   It’s a well know fact that Superintendents have an easy life but 77 is a bit much, especially in a time when the average life expectancy for a male infant aged one year was 46.   Of course, life expectancy figures are skewed by high rates of infant mortality.   At birth James WRIGHT had a life expectancy of just 41 years. The railway police were not covered by the pension provisions of the Police Act 1890 and instead each railway company made its own arrangements with special benevolent funds bei...